Prediction of Denys Klok [810th] vs Hazem Naow [574th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L L L W L
Form
W W L W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Klok 1 - 0 Naow
They have played 3 sets in total, with Klok winning 2 and Naow winning 1. The last match between Klok and Naow was at the M15 Kish Island, 19-03-2023, Final, Clay with Denys Klok getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Denys Klok | 1 |
| Hazem Naow | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Denys Klok
Player
Hazem Naow
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
81%
(
62 of
77)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:53:0 | Average Match Time | 1:53:0 |
| 68% (47/69) | 1st Serve % | 81% (62/77) |
| 57% (27/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (31/62) |
| 41% (9/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (3/15) |
| 73% (8/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (6/8) |
| 56% (43/77) | Return Points Win % | 48% (33/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Denys Klok vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Klok 1 - 0 Naow
Editorial Prediction:
Denys Klok Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alvaro Peiro Serrano
Player
Denys Klok
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Faurel
Player
Denys Klok
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Castagnola
Player
Denys Klok
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
44
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tadeas Paroulek
Player
Denys Klok
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Denys Klok
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Denys Klok
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Denys Klok
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Denys Klok
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denys Klok
Player
Faris Abdulhusain Abdulkarim Al Toobli
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
39%
(
11 of
28)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
50
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Hazem Naow
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Hazem Naow
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
80 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
50 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
118
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Matisse Bobichon
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Hazem Naow
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mika Brunold
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yaroslav Demin
Player
Hazem Naow
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Luis Garcia Paez
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (257/213) | Win/Loss | 64% (170/97) |
| 54% (572/482) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (374/233) |
| 52% (4882/4491) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3061/2561) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 557 | Aces Total | 385 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 816 | Total Double Faults | 690 |
| 1:14:4 | Average Match Time | 1:22:11 |
| 469.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 400.32 |
| 67% (15939/23794) | 1st Serve % | 67% (9776/14507) |
| 63% (10042/15939) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6326/9776) |
| 47% (3665/7855) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2255/4731) |
| 47% (1211/2574) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (801/1757) |
| 43% (9935/23351) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6478/14781) |
| 54% (251/462) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (166/262) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 44% (36/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (32/60) |
| 47% (55/116) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (38/74) |
| 87% (261/228) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (165/148) |
| 13% (261/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (165/17) |
| 14% (209/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (102/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
